Security Testing Services

The problem

Many “security testing” pages promise a full attack simulation and a certificate. That is not what most product teams need first, and it is not what we sell.

Security testing services, here, means QA on the controls you already claim: can role B see role A’s records, does a session expire, is the unauthenticated API as closed as the UI. It is application testing with a security lens.

We are not a penetration testing firm. We do not publish exploits, bypass kits, or attack procedures. We do not issue SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, or CREST-style stamps. If you need a formal pentest or a compliance audit, hire that specialist — we will say so.

What’s at risk without it

• Horizontal or vertical privilege mistakes
• Sessions that do not die on logout or timeout
• Auth on the UI and not on the API
• Debug endpoints or verbose errors in a staging URL that later becomes production
• A false sense of safety because “we use HTTPS”

What we test

• Sign-in, logout, password reset, and session timeout — as a user of your product
• Access control: another role, another tenant, a direct URL or API call to an object that should be forbidden
• Basic input handling on in-scope forms and APIs (malformed data, oversized fields) to see whether the application fails closed
• Exposure: whether error messages or client bundles leak obvious secrets you did not mean to ship

We do not run unsolicited scans against production. We do not test systems you do not own. Work happens in an environment you provide.

Related: API testing for contracts; AI red teaming for model jailbreaks; guardrail testing for filters you already deployed.

Our approach

1. Scope the surfaces and the roles (written, before we start)
2. Exercise those roles against each other’s data and actions
3. Log failures as defects with steps a developer can follow — not a trophy screenshot
4. Re-test the control after the fix

Deliverables

• Findings on auth, session, and access control in scope
• What was out of scope (infra, social engineering, physical, DDoS)
• A clear line: “this is QA evidence, not a pentest report”

Suitable for

Teams who want security-minded QA before a release, or a QA audit that includes access-control gaps. Not teams who need a certificate for a sales appendix.

FAQs

Is this a penetration test?

No. A pentest is a different specialist engagement. We test the product’s stated controls as QA.

Will you try to break into our production site?

No. We work in the environment you name, with permission, on the scope you write down.

Do you guarantee we are secure?

No. Nobody honest does. We report what we checked and what we found.