Services
Regression Testing Services
A dedicated regression habit: re-run the cases that already passed so last month’s fix does not come back with this week’s release.
The problem
Most escaped defects are not new ideas. They are old ones that returned when someone touched a nearby file, a prompt, or a dependency. If the only testing in the sprint is “the new ticket,” you are not doing regression testing. You are hoping.
Regression testing services are a planned re-run of cases that already mattered — after a change. Functional testing finds whether a feature works the first time. This page is whether it still works.
What’s at risk without it
- Bugs you already paid to fix
- Releases that get faster by skipping the boring checks
- Automation that exists and is skipped in CI
- AI or prompt changes that silently undo last month’s evaluation — see AI testing
What we test
- The agreed regression set: High RTM rows, money/auth/data journeys, and last cycle’s escaped defects
- The same cases on the new build, not a vague “smoke around the app”
- Automated cases that should have run, and the ones that are skipped or flaky
- A short exploratory pass only after the set is done (or waived)
We do not invent a 4,000-case suite to look busy. A short set that runs beats a graveyard.
Our approach
- Freeze or export the set for this release (IDs, not vibes)
- Execute or run automation against a named build
- Log fails with the case ID; file defects with the bug report standard
- Waive in writing if you cut scope
- Prune cases that no longer match the product
Test automation is how you make the boring part cheap. We will say which cases are worth automating rather than re-clicking forever.
Deliverables
- Execution log vs the set
- New defects and reopened defects
- Skips and waivers
- A recommended prune / automate list
Suitable for
Teams with a release train, a growing product, or a recent escape. Also teams who have “a regression pack” nobody trusts.
FAQs
How is this different from functional testing?
Functional testing designs and runs checks for current behaviour. Regression testing re-runs a known set after a change. The same people can do both; the artefact is different.
Do you only run automation?
No. We run what you have, then fill gaps manually. Automation that is skipped does not count.
How large should the set be?
Large enough to cover High risks, small enough to finish before the date. We would rather cut with a waiver than fake a full pass.
Talk to our QA team
Ready to discuss your testing needs?
Tell us about your product and where quality matters most. We will help you decide the right testing approach.