Nexus Eclipse

Resources

QA Metrics

QA metrics that change a decision: coverage you can defend, escaped defects, flake rate, and residual risk — not a vanity dashboard or a fake quality score.

QA metrics are numbers that change what you test next, or whether you ship. They are not a wall of charts that stay green while customers find the bug.

This page is for product QA. If the product is model-backed, also read LLM evaluation metrics. Those are a different set.

Metrics that usually earn their keep

Escaped defects

Bugs found in production (or by a customer) that a named test should have caught — or that no test covered. Pair with a short “why”: no case, wrong environment, skipped risk. This is how you improve the QA process, not how you blame a person.

Coverage you can explain

Not “87% of lines.” Requirement or journey coverage against an RTM, dated to a build. If you cannot name the journeys, you do not have coverage. You have a percentage.

Open defects by severity

A count is useless without severity vs priority. “47 bugs” includes typos and a broken checkout. Split them.

Automation flake rate

Failed runs that pass on retry with no product change. A high flake rate means the CI signal is theatre. Fix or delete those tests. See the test pyramid.

Cycle evidence, not “velocity”

Did this release leave a plan, a result, and a residual-risk note? A yes/no is a metric. Story points for QA usually are not.

Metrics that usually do not

  • Test-case count as a KPI (it rewards junk cases)
  • “Pass rate” when the suite is the wrong suite
  • Hours logged as quality
  • A single “quality score” with invented weights
  • Benchmarks from a vendor case study we did not publish — we do not invent those here either

How to report without lying

Name the build, the date, the set, and what the number cannot see. A dashboard that hides skipped risk is how teams ship with confidence they did not earn.

A QA audit is the right start when you have metrics and still cannot say what a release covered.

FAQs

What is the one QA metric to start with?

Escaped defects plus a one-line cause. Then journey coverage on the next release. Do not start with a 20-chart pack.

Are more test cases better?

No. See test cases. Count the journeys that matter, not the rows.

How do we start?

Book a QA consultation. Bring last month’s production bugs and whatever dashboard you already have. We will say which numbers to keep.

Talk to our QA team

Want this applied to your next release?

We write and maintain these artefacts on live products — then execute the cases, not only the documents.